GAMES Econ provides economic analysis in allegations of anticompetitive agreements and cartels.
GAMES Econ experience in matters involving allegations of anticompetitive agreements includes alleged price fixing cases, agreements to allocate territories or customers, group boycotts and information exchanges. We have also analyzed potential anticompetitive effects of various horizontal and vertical agreements, such as joint ventures and vertical restraints in distribution agreements.
GAMES Econ experts have worked for both plaintiffs and defendants, as well as regulators, on major cases involving credit card interchange fees, financial derivatives, public procurement, road freight transport, power cables, ATM networks, and the trucking and automobile industries in the context of preventive analysis, ongoing investigations, court appeals and claims for damages.
In these and other assignments, we have assessed the economic incentives of the alleged participants, tested hypotheses that distinguish competitive from collusive behavior, assessed the potential quantum of damages, and evaluated the potential risks and benefits of filing a leniency application.